Wednesday, January 19, 2011

Port Perry makes the Toronto Star...

... which is usually a bad thing. In any case, I guess Port Perry ALLEGEDLY has its own share of sneaky shysters. Although, after a judge makes his ruling, you've been sentenced as a shyster, I guess.
Peter Small
Toronto Star

A judge has ordered a Port Perry man to repay the Toronto-Dominion Bank $90,000 in cash given to him in error by a Stouffville branch five years ago.

Two low-ranking bank employees were later fired because of the mistake, made after William Zaparanuik came on Oct. 18, 2005 to pick up a pre-arranged $10,000 he wanted to pay for a used truck.

Staff quickly noticed they had given Zaparanuik $100,000 — 10 bundles of $100 bills stuffed in a black bag — $90,000 more than he came for.

But, by that time the sheet metal contractor had left.

The branch’s manager, William McKinney, and a teller drove to Zaparanuik’s work site and asked for the money back.

But he refused, claiming he only received $10,000.

The bank sued.

The branch manager testified that when he arrived at Zaparanuik’s work site, the contractor told him that if he was paid too much money, it was the bank’s fault.

“Mr. McKinney told the defendant that that was not how it worked, and that the defendant would be responsible for the extra money,” wrote Ontario Superior Court Justice Peter Lauwers.

Zaparanuik denied any such conversation took place, testifying that the bank manager was not specific about the problem.

The judge did not believe Zaparanuik.

“His first response, that it was the bank’s mistake and the bank’s fault, shows how Mr. Zaparanuik decided to play the situation,” the judge wrote.

“He made the wrong choice.”

The contractor knew he had been paid $100,000 in error, Lauwers ruled. “He saw it as an opportunity.”

An honest person would have produced all the evidence for the bank immediately, Lauwers wrote. “Instead, he disposed of or destroyed that evidence.”

Lauwers granted Toronto-Dominion Bank $90,000, plus interest.

He rejected the 33-year-old man’s counterclaim for damages for malicious prosecution and to recover legal costs associated with defending himself from a criminal charge.

Acting on the bank’s complaint, police charged him with theft over $5,000, but the Crown later withdrew the charge. It cost him $25,774.85 in legal fees to defend the criminal charge

Zaparanuik had tax problems because his mutual fund account, from which he normally made his tax payments, was frozen by the bank. He is now seriously in arrears on his income taxes.

Calls to Zaparanuik’s lawyers were not returned.
For the record, this isn't the TD Bank in town here in the Port. Our ATM machine doesn't work, and they don't convert pesos back into currency. [They say I have to go to Oshawa to find a bank that will do it.]

Why can't they suck in my favour, too? At least if I had $90,000 of theirs, they'd bargain with me a little and exchange my $20 back into Canadian currency.

No comments: